a

biogroutbiogrout

a


imageimage

Assessment of Discipline Maturity and Needs

With an enhanced understanding of discipline research interests and the broader idea of using biological processes to control the engineering behavior of soils, participants were charged to assess the maturity and needs of their respective discipline.  To accomplish this, participants were grouped into the following discipline areas:

Each group considered soil as an open reactor system to deliver and control specific engineering properties and functions.  They identified the primary “state variables”, the first-order factors, for their discipline that must be assessed/understood/quantified to determine if a proposed bio-soil process would be feasible/effective.  After ranking these variables in order of priority, the “maturity” (i.e. level of understanding, ability to measure and quantify, ability to model) of each state variable was assessed on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high).  After each group completed the exercise participants reassembled and shared their respective assessments.

The “state variables” ranked with low “maturity” effectively list the primary hard science and engineering research needs in each respective discipline.  These should/could be considered among the primary research needs for each respective discipline.

A summary of each discipline’s self assessment follows:

Geotechnical Engineering
  • Microstructure and fabric (3.5), image
  • Mineral-fluid interactions (2.5),
  • Bulk response (4),
  • Fluid movement (4.5),
  • Surface characteristics/interface (1),
  • Long term effects (2),
  • Heterogeneities (2),
  • Process control/by-products (2)
Back to Top

Environmental Engineering

  • Redox,
  • Pore Distribution,
  • Kinetic Controls,
  • Chemical Constituents,
  • Biological Functions (Spatial & Temporal),
  • Geological,
  • Hydraulic Conductivity,
  • Temperature,
  • Water Content/Multiphase,
  • Capillarity/Surface Tension (very important),
  • Colloid Transport, Functional State?,
  • Average Good Predictor?,
  • Geo/Chemo/Bio Transfer
Back to Top

Geochemistry & Biogeochemistry

  • Chemical composition and gradients: image
    • mineralogy (5),
    • fluid (5),
    • pH (5),
    • redox status (3),
  • Physical structure:
    • pore space (4),
    • fluid content (4);
  • Spatial distribution and dynamics (2),
  • Reaction rates (2),
  • Transport rates (3),
  • Genetic potential and expression of function (2),
  • Possible metabolic controls on geochemical pathways: molecular expression (1), resulting mass transformation (1),
  • Microbial signaling (1)
Back to Top

Microbiology & Biology

  • e- donors / acceptors (3),
  • Physical environment (pH, ion strength, particle size distribution, geochemical minerals, etc) (-),
  • Specific rate reactions of interest (0-4),
  • Key metabolic reactions (1-3),
  • Community architecture (composition, distribution) (3),
  • Inhibitors (1),
  • Biomass and turnover (3),
  • Localisation of activities cross-scale (scale dependent)

Back to Top

Agriculture & Soil Science

  • Water content (4), image
  • Organic matter (2),
  • Nutrient status (4),
  • Plants (2),
  • Stability (4),
  • Heterogeneity (1),
  • Water quality (2),
  • Contamination (2),
  • Biodiversity (4),
  • Sealing (hydraulic conductivity) (5)
Back to Top

Overarching State Variables
From these discipline specific assessments several overarching “state variables” were present, most of which were ranked with a relatively low level of maturity (i.e. level of understanding, ability to measure and quantify, ability to model).  These included:

  • Heterogeneity – microbial community, soil/pore gradation, spatial
  • Soil Structure and Pore Space Distribution – characteristics of pore space within which biological processes occur
  • Fluid Movement and Transport – fluid, microbial, and nutrient movement in the pore space
  • Up-Scaling – upscaling from mm to m scale while maintain science/engineering rigor
  • Biodiversity - microbial community composition and distribution

These overarching state variables are generally understood at the micro-scale with some level of idealization (e.g. uniform soil gradation, limit microbial diversity) and at the macro-scale in terms of average bulk properties (e.g. sandy soil, aerobic microbial dominant). 

In order to control biological processes for engineering purposes at the macro-scale (tens of cubic meters), the micro-scale processes must be up-scaled in a rigorous manner that successfully captures the relevant hard science and engineering.

The overarching state variables are the primary interdisciplinary research needs that must be addressed to realize the benefits of controlling biological processes for engineering purposes at the full scale.  As such, they require significant hard science and engineering research and should be primary research issues for existing as well as future research funding initiatives.


©2007 Bio-Soil Interactions & Engineering << Overview - Motivation - Opportunities - People - Workshop - Key Contacts - Members Only